CANUSA
    • Our Approach
    • Concept Development
    • Project Definition
    • Design-Build
    • Client Testimonials
    • Hydrocarbon Development
    • Electrical Power Delivery
    • Industrial Gas Markets
    • Emissions Reduction
  • EPC Resources
    • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Environmental Social & Governance
    • Careers
  • Contact US
  • Execution
    • Our Approach
    • Concept Development
    • Project Definition
    • Design-Build
    • Client Testimonials
  • EPC Expertise
    • Hydrocarbon Development
    • Electrical Power Delivery
    • Industrial Gas Markets
    • Emissions Reduction
  • EPC Resources
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Environmental Social & Governance
    • Careers
  • Contact US

EXECUTION

Helium Development

CO2 Removal from Helium

Location: Four Corners, AZ

The Challenge

ANUSA EPC was tasked with evaluating cost-effective methods of removing CO2 and heavy hydrocarbons from the raw helium production gas of an existing helium polishing plant. Due to unusually high concentrations of contaminants, the plant was unable to achieve its target helium purity at the facility’s nameplate capacity. Operational difficulties were forcing the plant to run below its rated capacity, leading to lost revenue.

The Solution

CANUSA EPC conducted a FEED study to evaluate several different options to remove contaminants while minimizing helium losses and plant downtime.

  • Process models built in ProMax based on helium gas analysis and operating conditions
    • Modeled the efficiencies of chemical solvents for CO2 removal in an amine absorber
    • Modeled solvent regeneration power load of all options
    • Modeled inlet compression to optimize containment removal
  • Chemical solvent evaluation
    • Evaluated feasibility of chemical solvents, physical solvents, membranes, desiccant adsorbents, and charcoal filters for contaminant removal
    • Contacted vendors for level-four cost estimates and lead times
  • Evaluated OPEX changes
    • Evaluated options for lowering OPEX by utilizing hydrocarbon contaminants for heat generation
    • Considered opportunities to lower OPEX and increase equipment efficiency by utilizing heat exchangers

Result: Higher Rates Of Recovery Of Helium

  • We provided results of advantages/disadvantages of options considered
    • Included vendor data and special considerations
    • Provided Class IV CAPEX and OPEX for all evaluated options
    • Provided projected schedule for development
  • Solution pursued by the client would reduce PSA cycles, leading to a higher rate of recovery of Helium

Explore Other Projects

  • Helium Development

    Helium Tolling Expansion

    Shiprock, NM
  • Helium Development

    Multi-well Helium Purification Battery

    Holbrook, AZ

EPC Resources
for Energy Leaders

Our library of whitepapers, presentations, news updates, and online tools are designed to equip and support you.

Visit Resources
  • Execution
  • Our Approach
  • Concept Development
  • Project Definition
  • Design-Build
  • Client Testimonials
  • EPC Resources
  • Solutions
  • Natural Gas Processing Plant
  • Onsite Power Generation
  • Well Pads
  • Gathering System
  • Carbon Capture
  • Helium Development
  • Emissions

Contact

Canada: 403-723-4256
USA: 833-744-4887


info@canusaepc.com


LinkedIn

Offices

Canada Office
630, 8th Ave SW, Suite 500
Calgary, AB, T2P1G6
Canada


United States Office
600, 17th St, Suite 1400N
Denver, CO, 80202
United States

© CANUSA EPC.